79.1 F
Virginia
Sunday, June 22, 2025

Mike Chapman, Virginia’s Sheriff Keeping Streets Safe Through Enforcement of the Law

Traffic stops and searches of motorists in Loudoun County have increased dramatically the first three months of this year compared to the same period in 2024, sparking complaints from activists and some residents.

Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office, ICE, & Keeping You Safe

LCSO, ICE, and Keeping You Safe – Fact versus Fiction  Loudoun County, VA (June 12, 2025): The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office (LCSO) is recognized as a national leader in keeping our residents safe. Serious crime was down an additional 29% in the first quarter of 2025, and Loudoun continues to be the safest locality in the Washington metropolitan region. Unfortunately, LCSO’s commitment to your safety has been mischaracterized by a small number of political activists with a record of opposing public safety. There is fiction, and there are the facts. First, our relationship with U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): FICTION: The LCSO signed a new agreement with ICE to target people based on their immigration status. FACT: The agreement we signed with ICE, not yet in force, applies only to persons already at the Adult Detention Center (ADC) on unrelated criminal charges. It gives ICE extra time (up to 48 hours) to pick up criminal aliens upon their release from custody at our local jail. FICTION: Holding a detainee an extra day or two creates a heavy financial burden on Loudoun’s taxpayers. FACT: Most costs are fixed at our ADC, regardless of the jail population, and the average cost of holding a detainee longer amounts to about $4.50 per day.  Our agreement also provides that ICE will pay for any medical costs associated with that hold. That’s a small price to pay for public safety. Second, traffic enforcement: FICTION: The Latino community is being targeted in motor vehicle stops and searches.  FACT: Increased traffic enforcement is the most frequent request from our Board of Supervisors and the residents we serve, and motor vehicle stops are only conducted by patrol deputies when violations are observed. We have increased those efforts countywide – especially in eastern Loudoun where traffic is the greatest – and the result has been greater public safety.FICTION: Vehicle stops, searches, and arrests should be proportional to demographic population groups. If not, this indicates profiling. FACT:  We deploy our deputies based on data-driven analysis – where calls for service and crime trends are the greatest.  Eastern Loudoun has high population density and diversity, as well as the most traffic, crashes, calls for service and crime, so we deploy more deputies there. This is not profiling, and serious crime in eastern Loudoun was down 30% in the first quarter of this year.FICTION: The LCSO is stopping and searching vehicles based on immigration status. FACT: Vehicles stops and searches are done for cause, and immigration status has nothing to do with it. Vehicles are searched for one of three reasons: when there is probable cause related to potential criminal activity; as part of an inventory following an arrest; or following a request and consent. Our deputies never ask for a person’s immigration status, nor is that information available to them when they make a vehicle stop or arrest. FICTION: Residents are complaining about traffic enforcement in eastern Loudoun. FACT:  The LCSO has received few complaints about traffic enforcement and crime prevention, most of which have been orchestrated by persons with political agendas in conflict with public safety.Third, transparency: FICTION: The LCSO is not transparent with the information it releases. FACT: The LCSO is highly transparent. We regularly report to the community we serve and provide all releasable information in accordance with the Code of Virginia and Freedom of Information Act, and in coordination with the Loudoun County Attorney.  Information about detainers and warrants from other law enforcement agencies for persons arrested in Loudoun on local charges may be requested from those agencies. https://sheriff.loudoun.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=9860LCSO, ICE y su Seguridad - Realidad versus FicciónCondado de Loudoun, Virginia (12 de junio de 2025): La Oficina del Sheriff del Condado de Loudoun (LCSO) es reconocida como líder nacional en la seguridad de nuestros residentes. Los delitos graves disminuyeron un 29 % en el primer trimestre de 2025, y Loudoun sigue siendo la localidad más segura del área metropolitana de Washington.Lamentablemente, el compromiso de la LCSO con su seguridad ha sido malinterpretado por un pequeño grupo de activistas políticos con un historial de oposición a la seguridad pública. Hay ficción y hay hechos.Primero, nuestra relación con el Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas de EE. UU. (ICE):FICCIÓN: La LCSO firmó un nuevo acuerdo con ICE para identificar a las personas según su estatus migratorio.REALIDAD: El acuerdo que firmamos con ICE, aún no vigente, se aplica únicamente a las personas que ya se encuentran en el Centro de Detención para Adultos (ADC) por cargos penales no relacionados. Le otorga a ICE tiempo adicional (hasta 48 horas) para detener a extranjeros delincuentes tras su liberación en nuestra cárcel local.FICCIÓN: Detener a un detenido uno o dos días más representa una pesada carga financiera para los contribuyentes del Condado de Loudoun.REALIDAD: La mayoría de los costos son fijos en nuestro Centro de Detención para Adultos (ADC), independientemente de la población carcelaria, y el costo promedio de retener a un detenido por más tiempo asciende a aproximadamente $4.50 por día. Nuestro acuerdo también estipula que ICE pagará cualquier costo médico asociado con esa detención. Es un pequeño precio que pagar por la seguridad pública.Segundo, la aplicación de las leyes de tránsito:FICCIÓN: La comunidad latina está siendo blanco de detenciones y registros de vehículos motorizados.REALIDAD: El aumento de las leyes de tránsito es la solicitud más frecuente de nuestra Junta de Supervisores y de los residentes a los que servimos, y las detenciones de vehículos motorizados solo las realizan los agentes de patrulla cuando se observan infracciones. Hemos incrementado estas medidas en todo el condado, especialmente en el este de Loudoun, donde hay mayor tráfico, y el resultado ha sido una mayor seguridad pública. FICCIÓN: Las detenciones, registros y arrestos de vehículos deberían ser proporcionales a los grupos demográficos de la población. De no ser así, esto indica perfilación.REALIDAD: Desplegamos a nuestros agentes basándonos en análisis basados en datos, donde las llamadas de servicio y las tendencias delictivas son mayores. La zona este de Loudoun tiene una alta densidad y diversidad poblacional, así como la mayor cantidad de tráfico, accidentes, llamadas de servicio y delincuencia, por lo que desplegamos más agentes allí. Esto no es perfilación, y la delincuencia grave en la zona este de Loudoun disminuyó un 30 % en el primer trimestre de este año.FICCIÓN: La LCSO detiene y registra vehículos basándose en su estatus migratorio. REALIDAD: Las detenciones y registros de vehículos se realizan con justificación, y el estatus migratorio no tiene nada que ver. Los vehículos se registran por una de tres razones: cuando existe una causa probable relacionada con una posible actividad delictiva; como parte de un inventario posterior a un arresto; o tras una solicitud y consentimiento. Nuestros agentes nunca preguntan por el estatus migratorio de una persona, ni tienen acceso a esa información cuando detienen o arrestan a una persona un vehículo. FICCIÓN: Los residentes se quejan de la aplicación de las leyes de tránsito en el este de Loudoun. REALIDAD: La LCSO ha recibido pocas quejas sobre la aplicación de las leyes de tránsito y la prevención del delito, la mayoría de las cuales han sido orquestadas por personas con agendas políticas en conflicto con la seguridad pública. Tercero, transparencia: FICCIÓN: La LCSO no es transparente con la información que divulga. REALIDAD: La LCSO es altamente transparente. Informamos periódicamente a la comunidad a la que servimos y proporcionamos toda la información disponible de conformidad con el Código de Virginia y la Ley de Libertad de Información, en coordinación con el Fiscal del Condado de Loudoun. Información sobre órdenes de detención y órdenes de arresto emitidas por otras agencias del orden público referente a personas arrestadas en Loudoun por cargos locales, se puede solicitar a dichas agencias. https://sheriff.loudoun.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=9860 

Virginia doesn’t have statewide data center regulations. Localities are making their own rules.

Virginia is home to over a third of the data centers worldwide. These energy hungry facilities have brought business to the commonwealth, but communities are seeing the impact of the electricity and water usage hit their utility bills. Now, many localities are debating how to balance the opportunities and challenges data centers present, and grappling with how to regulate them.

Phyllis Randall blocks Loudoun Board from taking a stand on Tysons casino, despite fact Loudoun has commented on issues in Fairfax and West Virginia

Despite receiving 5,000 letters from Loudoun residents opposed to a gambling in Tysons, plus a letter from 33 prominent Loudoun businesses, civic leaders and former elected officials in opposition, the County Board of Supervisors on January 22nd took no position on Senate Bill 982 (SB982), which would enable in Tysons, and potentially in Reston and Dulles, if amended.

Addressing the board during public comment, Christopher Stevenson, of the Community Levee Association in Loudoun, and member of the Mormon Church, presented boxes containing about 5,000 letters to the board, all signed by Loudoun residents, opposing the casino.  Stevenson, a resident, focused his comments on gambling addiction and its negative impact on individuals and families.    

He was followed by this writer, who urged the board to formally adopt in its Legislative Agenda opposition to SB982, which has passed two State Senate subcommittees and the Finance Committee. It now goes to the full Senate floor and then the House of Delegates.

This writer, a former County Supervisor, was one of three former supervisors among 33 co-singers, including former -endorsed member Tom Marshall, in signing the letter. (Copy of letter below.)

No motion was made to have the board oppose the bill, but Chairman said in comments:

“I am never going to make a position that does not deal with the county.  The casino is for County, and the bill almost puts the location in Tysons Corner.

“I don’t know what I would tell [Fairfax County Supervisor Chair] Jeff McKay if Loudoun weighed in on something in Fairfax County. And we would not like it if they weighed in on something in Loudoun.”

But the Fairfax Board of Supervisors opposes the casino and SB982 — and this writer apprised the Board of that in public comment.

In addition, the Loudoun Board has very much weighed in on issues in Fairfax County and even in West Virginia.  The current Loudoun Board’s legislative agenda opposes high tolls on I-66 even though I-66 is in Fairfax County, not Loudoun.

And, in 2018, Randall and other Board members opposed the Rockwool fibers plant in Kearneysville, West Virginia, which crated an outcry in western Loudoun.

According to a Loudoun article, “Loudoun County Chairwoman Phyllis J. Randall (D-At Large) has come out publicly in opposition to the plant, while western supervisors Geary M. Higgins (R-Catoctin) and Tony R. Buffington (R-Blue Ridge) will ask county staff members to look into the plant’s impacts on Loudoun when the board reconvenes in September.” 

That plant has since opened and the impact on Loudoun has been minuscule.  In contrast, a casino in Tysons could generate thousands of new vehicles on the Beltway, Dulles Toll Road, and other roads that impact Loudoun motorists every day – let alone the socioeconomic threats.

For example, according to “World Casino News,” a letter was submitted to the State Senate from “109 former intelligence and defense personnel…[cautioning] that a casino in Tysons would attract both organized crime and foreign intelligence services seeking to exploit individuals with high-level security clearances. The opponents stress that the area’s dense concentration of federal employees and contractors makes it a particularly vulnerable target for espionage.” 

headquarters is just a 13-minute drive from where the casino could be built at the Spring Hill Metro Station.

Finally, there is the threat of a casino landing at Dulles Airport, according to sources.  And, proponents of the SB982, Sens. Scott Surovell and David Marsden, both Fairfax County , could amend it very easily to add a Reston or Dulles location during this legislative session.

Surovell, Marsden, House Speaker Don Scott (D-Portsmouth), and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Louise Lucas (D-Portsmouth) are among the major beneficiaries of some $1.3 million in campaign donations from Comstock Holdings and its CEO, Chris Clemente, who would build the casino.  Comstock also has donated about $50,000 to Republican candidates for Governor, Lt. Governor, and Attorney General, and other GOP General Assembly members.

In addition, Comstock has spent about $276,000 for lobbying in Richmond. 

No casino operator has yet been identified for the project, but unions have already worked out a project labor agreement with the developer.  A coalition of mostly Fairfax County civic groups and churches, plus the Vienna Town Council, oppose the Tysons plan and may have been involved in generating the opposition letters from Loudoun residents, sources said.  Visit https://nocasinocoalition.org/

If the General Assembly adopts the bill as written, the Fairfax Board has three years to put the issue to referendum to Fairfax voters.  Loudoun citizens would have the same opportunity to vote if the casino were placed within Loudoun’s boundaries.  But at this juncture, at least five Fairfax County senators, all Democrats, oppose the project, but the 40-member Senate could pass it with help from Republicans.

Neither Randall nor County Administrator Tim Hemstreet responded to emails before deadline to explain how the Loudoun Board decides to weigh in on projects outside its borders, despite Randall’s statement to the contrary.

Editor’s Note: Mr. Reid is active in opposing casinos in and circulated the letter signed by the 33 Loudoun leaders.

Ken Reid has been a journalist and editor for more than 45 years and served on the Leesburg Town Council (2006 to 2011, and again in 2017), and on the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors (2012-2015).

Copy of letter from Loudoun businesses, civic leaders and former elected officials, opposing the proposed casino in northern Virginia.

January 20, 2025

Dear Members of the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors,

We, the undersigned community and business leaders of Loudoun County, write you to express our strong opposition to the proposed casino development in Northern Virginia, which will most likely be in Tysons. We strongly believe Loudoun County would not benefit from this project, and instead would shoulder the burden of its negative impacts. 

Therefore, we strongly urge the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors and our state legislative delegation to make it clear that this casino is not welcome in our region – and oppose SB982, the bill before the General Assembly.   

Significant Traffic Impacts

The introduction of a casino in Northern Virginia would inevitably exacerbate traffic, congestion and commute times. The additional traffic generated by a development like a casino in Tysons, which already has some of the worst traffic in the region, would worsen congestion and commutes across Northern Virginia, but particularly for Loudoun residents who commute to Washington, D.C. and other communities closer to Washington.

These traffic impacts would be felt on main roads such as the Dulles Toll Road, the Dulles Greenway, as well as Route 7 and Route 28, as well as local cut-through roads throughout the region. In addition, it is highly likely that toll prices and ride-share rates would increase as well, making commutes not only longer but more expensive. This would negatively impact those in our community who can least afford it, including single mothers and low-income individuals.

No Revenue Benefits

For the residents of Loudoun, the implications of a casino in Fairfax County are doubly problematic because not only would local residents and commuters have to put up with the significant traffic impacts, but Loudoun County would see absolutely no benefits from increased tax revenue. Instead, local communities would see only the negative impacts, with none of the promised economic benefits.  

As local business and community leaders in Loudoun County, we are clear-eyed about the detrimental impacts a casino in Northern Virginia would have. It is clear that this project will not serve the best interests of our community and will only create more challenges for those who live and work here.

Negative Impact on Local Quality of Life

Elected officials and local leaders have long worked together to build and promote thriving communities across Northern Virginia, including in Loudoun County. This region is now one of the economic drivers, not just of the Commonwealth, but of the entire country. Unfortunately, a casino development would do little, if anything, to contribute positively to this region and the culture that have made it such a great place to live and raise a family.

We strongly urge you to publicly oppose this casino project. The negative impacts for Loudoun County and Loudoun County residents are clear.

Sincerely,

PAST ELECTED OFFICIALS

Hon. Tom Marshall, Loudoun School Board Member (nine years)
Leesburg

Hon. Janet Clarke, former Blue Ridge Supervisor

Hon. Kenneth Reid, former Leesburg Supervisor and Town Councilmember

Hon. Bruce Tulloch, former Vice chair, Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
Leesburg

PRESERVATION

Eugene and Annette Scheel
Waterford

BUSINESS/PHILANTHROPY

Prescott Eagle
Waterford

Scott Hamberger
Hillsboro

Bruce Roberts
Former owner, Leesburg Pharmacy
Leesburg  

Scott Cypher, chiropractor, retired
Leesburg

Elicia Brand, media executive
Leesburg

Stephen Penna, A Life’s Aquatics
Sterling

FAITH COMMUNITY

Chris Stevenson/Shan Stevenson/Megan Stevenson
The Community Levee Association of Loudoun County
Purcellville

Pastor Jack Stagman
Leesburg

Virginia Pomata, leader, Missions Team, Galilee UMC Chapel 
Lansdowne Woods  

Marc Nodell, Jewish community
Ashburn

CIVIC 

Ana Quijano, music teacher/concert violinist
Leesburg

Tom Seeman
Leesburg

Santos Munoz  
Aldie

Jonathan Erickson
Sterling

Damon Cable
Purcellville

Elizabeth Burns
Leesburg

Robert Follett, MIT Alumni
Ashburn

Joan Gorman
Lansdowne Woods

John and Natalie Alexander
Broadlands

James Reid
Ashburn

Thomas Aquilina
Leesburg

Margaret Hamaker
Lansdowne

Bill Leake
Leesburg

Linda Glenn
Leesburg

Angela Hepola
Leesburg

Katharine Ricart
Leesburg

Joanne Tolle
Leesburg

Cc:

Virginia State Senate
Hon. Kannan Srinivasan
Hon. Russet Perry

House of Delegates
Hon. David Reid
Hon. Atoosa Reaser
Hon. J.J. Singh
Hon. Fernando (Marty) Martinez
Hon. Geary Higgins

NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Subscribe to our newsletter!  Get updates on all the latest news in Virginia.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
×