Loudoun County School Board member defends turning off cameras during public comment sessions

Loudoun County School Board member Arben Istrefi (Sterling) is defending a decision last Spring to turn off cameras at school board meetings during public comment sessions. Loudoun County government and school board proceedings are normally taped, televised and made available to the public unless the body enters into executive session.

However, at its March 12, 2024 meeting, the Loudoun County School Board voted 6-3 to turn off  cameras during the public comment portion of their meetings stating they did not want the school board meeting to devolve into “chaos” on controversial topics, and they wanted to allow the public to speak about sensitive topics without them being videotaped out of consideration for the speakers.

Normally, citizens understand that when they speak at a public meeting that they are going to be videotaped and recorded. Under the new policy, the video stream of meetings provide only the audio and closed captioning during that portion of the agenda. 

The decision came down to a 6-3 vote on an amendment made by Chair Melinda Mansfield (Dulles), who said she did not intend for the public comment period to be used for “political grandstanding.” 

Ashburn District School Board member Deana Griffiths tried to get cameras turned back on public speakers during their comments, claiming not having them took away the speaker’s dignity. 

The previous school board stopped showing faces June 22, 2021, the day of a highly charged meeting that drew a large crowd to speak on a draft policy on transgender student rights and grew unruly, resulting in an arrest. The previous board decided to stop showing faces out of concerns critics were using the forum to create attention-getting videos. Under that practice cameras remained, but transmitted an angle that did not show speakers.

Griffiths presented a request as an information item during the board’s Feb. 27 meeting and sought a suspension of the board’s procedural rules to vote on turning the cameras back on. She was not successful in getting a two-thirds majority vote required to suspend the rules and the item was placed on the March 12 agenda for action where it passed.

Her effort ended with an amendment to adopt a policy of turning cameras off completely and have only audio and closed captioning available. That was approved on the 6-3 vote, with Lauren Shernoff (Leesburg), LaBell (Catoctin) and Griffiths opposed.

In an interview with WJLA7 two days ago, Istrefi finally addressed the long-standing issue saying, “I understand the concerns and I appreciate the question. I have tried to vote with an open mind on all issues. I believe LCPS did a fantastic job in trying to improve the trust. I believe our superintendent says, ‘When you know better, you do better’.”

He continued: “I believe we have a great public comment system, which allows everyone to speak their mind,” Istrefi said. “We have held listening sessions. We have documentation containing all of the feedback received from these listening sessions.”

“Part of my decision was to consider other people who may come to the meeting, especially when they have a controversial topic that they would like to discuss,” Istrefi replied.

WJLA7 reporter Nick Minock said, “If that is the case, then they can meet you privately. This is a period for public comments. When you go to a public comments period, it’s clear that you will be heard both by the public and your school board representatives. Sumera Rashid, one of your colleagues on the school board, voted with you to turn off the camera because she didn’t want to have a Jerry Springer-style episode. Are you in agreement with her?”

Istrefi replied, “I won’t comment on the comments of another member of the school board. I think, again, that when you compare me to other school divisions I think we were able to show that we wanted to hear from our constituencies. We’re still allowing everybody to come and talk. It’s important to me that we focus on transparency and trust.”

Michael Rivera, a former school board candidate, told All Virginia News, “What Istrefi basically said is mush. It has no substance. You ran on transparency, be transparent.”

Others commented they also felt it’s not the school board’s role to determine “comfortability” of speakers or try to avoid the public from seeing comments made by citizens who disagree with school board policies and are airing their grievances.

“If it’s an open and public comment period then it should be open and public!” said a parent who has two children in the school district. “To do anything else is secretive and shady.”

Audrey Carpenter is the Northern Virginia Bureau Chief for All Virginia News. She can be reached at: audreycarpenter@allvirginia.news

At this dangerous time for journalism in Virginia

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you close this tab, we want to ask if you could support All Virginia News at this challenging time for independent journalism in the Commonwealth.

Virginia is currently governed by a Democratic trifecta—Governor Abigail Spanberger in the Executive Mansion, Democrats holding majorities in both the House of Delegates and the Senate, along with key leadership positions held by figures such as Lt. Governor Ghazala Hashmi, Attorney General Jay Jones, House Speaker Don Scott, and others. In any period of one-party dominance, the risk of reduced transparency and accountability grows. A strong, independent press is essential to scrutinize those in power, regardless of party affiliation.

Across the nation and here in Virginia, press freedom faces real pressures: from political threats and regulatory actions to corporate influence and economic challenges that can compromise editorial independence. When government officials—whether in Richmond or Washington—attempt to shape coverage through pressure, investigations, funding decisions, or favoritism, it undermines public trust and democratic health.

All Virginia News exists to serve Virginia readers first. We are not owned by billionaires or large corporations with political agendas. Our commitment is straightforward: deliver factual, thorough reporting that holds every elected official accountable—Democrat, Republican, or independent—without fear or favor. We believe democracy functions best with a robust, independent press that provides Virginians the full picture, free from partisan spin.

What sustains us through these challenges is the direct support of our readers. A majority of our funding comes from individuals like you who value trustworthy, paywall-free journalism. Your contributions preserve our editorial independence and allow us to continue aggressive, non-partisan oversight of state government, policies, and their impact on Virginia families.

We know these requests are never as welcome as the reporting itself, but without reader support, this work simply could not continue. Of course, we understand that not everyone is in a position to contribute financially, and we remain grateful for your readership either way.

If you are able, please support All Virginia News today. All gifts matter, but recurring contributions are especially valuable as they help us plan and sustain our coverage long-term (and reduce the frequency of these appeals). It takes just a moment to give. Thank you for standing with independent journalism and helping protect a free press that serves all Virginians.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles